#TORTOISEHG VS TORTOISESVN CODE#
#TORTOISEHG VS TORTOISESVN SERIES#
#TORTOISEHG VS TORTOISESVN WINDOWS#

Commands like git rebase –interactive let you rewrite history, possibly discarding data along the way. Git, on the other hand, lets you play fast and loose with your project’s history. This command will “undo” the last pull or commit, but will never touch anything further back. Mercurial’s philosophy is that “history is permanent and sacred.” Core Mercurial includes only one single command that can alter history: hg rollback. Worse, it simply isn’t necessary, as Mercurial’s Subversion-user-friendly but still powerful and elegant interface proves. While you can work around this by retraining your fingers to type the new commands, it’s yet one more roadblock to switching systems. Subversion (SVN)Īs you can see, Git makes less of an effort to organize its CLI in a way that Subverison users will be used to. Mercurial/Git commands that are the same as their Subversion equivalents are bold. Here’s a comparison of some of the most common commands. Mercurial’s CLI is also quite similar to Subversion’s, which can help ease the transition between the two tools. You can create your own git move alias if you like, but that’s yet another step to try to make Git’s CLI pleasant to use while Mercurial’s is pleasant by default. For example, the hg rename command can also be run with hg move or hg mv. Mercurial tries to be helpful by anticipating some of the more common aliases for commands and just making them work.

It favors clarity over “cleverness”, which makes for an easier-to-use tool. It’s easy to find what you’re looking for - using hg help, so you can spend less time looking at docs and get back to coding. Mercurial’s simple approach leads to documentation which is sleek and concise. Git’s documentation must detail all the interactions between options, which makes it more verbose and difficult to skim. This makes for less typing, but requires you to remember all of the various options and how they interact with each other. Each command has many options that can change its behavior. Git’s CLI is designed to be extremely flexible. It follows the UNIX philosophy: “each command should do one thing and do it well.” Mercurial’s CLI is full-featured, stable, and elegant. The command line interface is the first thing many programmers will see when using a new version control system.

#TORTOISEHG VS TORTOISESVN SERIES#

There are many reasons (and opinions) why one would choose Git or Hg, and the next two blog posts in this series aim to explain some of these Whys. There are two major distributed version control systems in widespread use today: Mercurial (Hg) and Git.

In our previous posts, we talked about the history of version control and why it’s a good thing, as well as why distributed version control systems are better than centralized systems. Check out Steve’s projects to see some of the cool things he has worked on around Distributed Version Control, or jump over to his Bitbucket account and fork one of his many projects. This causes standard non- CVSNT servers to fail as these are not aware of this argument.This is a guest blog post by Steve Losh focusing on the primary reasons a team may choose Mercurial as their (distributed) version control system. TortoiseCVS will always add argument '-c' to most CVS operations when communicating with a CVS server.

#TORTOISEHG VS TORTOISESVN CODE#

Some of the code was derived from WinCVS and CVSNT.

The project was started by Francis Irving when he was employed by Creature Labs to provide a better interface to CVS for his colleagues. The tortoise in the logo is called Charlie Vernon Smythe (CVS). The name is a pun on the word shell ( computing, turtle). Moreover, it adds icons onto files and directories controlled by CVS, giving additional information to the user without having to run a full-scale stand-alone application. Unlike most CVS tools, it includes itself in Windows' shell by adding entries in the contextual menu of the file explorer, therefore it does not run in its own window.

#TORTOISEHG VS TORTOISESVN WINDOWS#

TortoiseCVS is a CVS client for Microsoft Windows released under the GNU General Public License. Arabic, Brazilian Portuguese, Catalan, Chinese (simplified), Chinese (traditional), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, Georgian, German, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Slovene, Spanish, Turkish

Tortoisehg vs tortoisesvn